Tuesday, December 19, 2006
Creating more victims: Part Two
Comments:
Links to this post:
<< Home
So Misty opposes the death penalty because she wants to avoid some discomfort? What ever happened to people answering for their crimes? And what about the discomfort of the people who the murdered left behind? The ones left behind have to try and pick up the pieces of their life after a loved one is BRUTALLY MURDERED by an assailant! The death penalty is a perfectly acceptable means of punishment for a MURDERER. The murder has to answer for what they have done, and part of that price is hurting their loved ones too.
Granted, some are wrongfully accused, but that is just a part of the justice system. Don't think that because a few people are wronged we should abolish the death penalty altogether. It is a deterrent for those who would otherwise commit murder. In wars how many thousands of innocent people are killed? The number of innocent people executed is in the hundreds, not thousands, and if the death penalty is abolished think how many people would be killed as a result of murderers knowing they can't be harmed at all.
If we accept justice as giving every man his due(Plato), then anything that hurts innocents is most unjust. Likewise, if we say that any innocents killed through capital punishment is an "acceptable loss", then what are we saying about our views on the value of life? while a commitment to justice is admirable, we must not be so manically obsessed with the "rule of law" that we stop respecting life.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
<< Home


